|
|
swaroop2011
Posts: 668
  
Country : India |
Is it possible to show results/ rankings for best 2 out of 3 results. That will give much better idea of actual rankings ? |
|
debmohanty
Country : India | swaroop2011 - 2015-11-06 5:55 AM
Is it possible to show results/ rankings for best 2 out of 3 results. That will give much better idea of actual rankings ? Good point Swaroop. Will do the needful. |
|
vopani
Posts: 739
Country : India | vopani posted @ 2015-11-06 10:06 AM debmohanty - 2015-11-06 6:01 AM
swaroop2011 - 2015-11-06 5:55 AM
Is it possible to show results/ rankings for best 2 out of 3 results. That will give much better idea of actual rankings ? Good point Swaroop. Will do the needful.
I don't get the point of showing best 2 out of 3. Finally, the worst two results get discarded. Why are we discarding just 1? I don't think this is an indication of actual rankings.
If you show results of best 1 out of 3, thats the 'actual score' the players are currently in. Or, always show best 6 out of 8, where all the remaining rounds are 0 until they get populated.
|
|
swaroop2011
Posts: 668
Country : India | Rohan Rao - 2015-11-06 10:06 AM
debmohanty - 2015-11-06 6:01 AM
swaroop2011 - 2015-11-06 5:55 AM
Is it possible to show results/ rankings for best 2 out of 3 results. That will give much better idea of actual rankings ? Good point Swaroop. Will do the needful.
I don't get the point of showing best 2 out of 3. Finally, the worst two results get discarded. Why are we discarding just 1? I don't think this is an indication of actual rankings.
If you show results of best 1 out of 3, thats the 'actual score' the players are currently in. Or, always show best 6 out of 8, where all the remaining rounds are 0 until they get populated.
I said in the sense that, as some of us are authoring 1 round each, so we know that that round will be definitely discarded. So in that sense I said to show best 2 out of 3 until we have more enough rounds to discard 2 of them. |
|
debmohanty
Country : India | |
|
debmohanty
Country : India | |
|
swaroop2011
Posts: 668
Country : India |
Since we have enough rounds now, can we have best 4 out of 6 ? : ) |
|
Administrator
Country : India | |
|
swaroop2011
Posts: 668
Country : India | Thanks. It's turning out exciting. Close fight between 1st and 2nd spot, and similarly between 3rd and 4th spot. |
|
Administrator
Country : India | swaroop2011 - 2016-01-27 9:56 PM
Thanks. It's turning out exciting. Close fight between 1st and 2nd spot, and similarly between 3rd and 4th spot. and 5th and 6th too. |
|
swaroop2011
Posts: 668
Country : India | Administrator - 2016-01-27 9:59 PM
swaroop2011 - 2016-01-27 9:56 PM
Thanks. It's turning out exciting. Close fight between 1st and 2nd spot, and similarly between 3rd and 4th spot. and 5th and 6th too.
yeah. Missed that. ^_^ |
|
debmohanty
Country : India | |
|
Mjdentist
Posts: 2
| Unable to understand this puzzle, can any one let me know what is this? |
|
rakesh_rai
Posts: 774
Country : India | Mjdentist - 2016-03-17 5:31 PM
Unable to understand this puzzle, can any one let me know what is this? Which puzzle are you referring to? |
|
Administrator
Country : India | |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | Hmm, ended up at 13th, that's good considering I authored the round I'm probably strongest at :P |
|
marred
Posts: 12
Country : Poland | marred posted @ 2016-03-29 1:35 PM Thanks for great contest, I can't wait to 2016/17 edition. |
|
brecher92
Posts: 30
Country : United States | Same here. Somehow the contests always ended up scheduled on bad weekends for me -- hope to compete in more than 2 of 8 next time.
p.s. I vote for longer timeframes for each context -- weeknights are usually better for me than weekends.
Edited by brecher92 2016-04-05 6:26 AM
|
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | Venue and details for offline finals
Please check here for the venue, dates, participation fee, and other necessary details about the offline finals of Puzzle Ramayan & IPC 2016 here - http://logicmastersindia.com/SM/2015-16sm-pr-finals.asp
Please note that the top 50 of PR can also participate in day one's Sudoku Mahabharat event.
An email will be sent to the qualifiers shortly with an invite letter containing the same details.
Feel free to post any queries you may have here.
|
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | Mails have been sent to the top 50 of PR. Some of these mails may have been sent as a part of the SM bunch since the invite is the same. Please check your spam if you don't see it in your inbox, read up, and give us a reply. |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | Preliminary version of the Instruction booklet of Puzzle Ramayan (Day 2) has been sent to participants. |
|
vopani
Posts: 739
Country : India | vopani posted @ 2016-06-23 10:03 PM Will the order of puzzles in PB be same as that in IB?
If not, can the points table reflect the correct order of puzzles in PB?
|
|
debmohanty
Country : India | Rohan Rao - 2016-06-23 10:03 PM
Will the order of puzzles in PB be same as that in IB?
If not, can the points table reflect the correct order of puzzles in PB?
For rounds 1,2,4 -> order of puzzles in PB will match with that in IB.
I'm not 100% sure about R3 yet, but it should match too. If it does not, we will reflect the same in points table. |
|
debmohanty
Country : India | debmohanty - 2016-06-24 5:28 AM
Rohan Rao - 2016-06-23 10:03 PM
Will the order of puzzles in PB be same as that in IB?
If not, can the points table reflect the correct order of puzzles in PB?
For rounds 1,2,4 -> order of puzzles in PB will match with that in IB.
I'm not 100% sure about R3 yet, but it should match too. If it does not, we will reflect the same in points table.
Confirming that the order of puzzles in R3 will be same as that in IB. |
|
vopani
Posts: 739
Country : India | vopani posted @ 2016-07-08 1:25 PM In Area Maze,
1. Can we infer in the puzzle below that the answer is 6cm2? Or is the data insufficient?
2. Can we infer in the puzzle below that the answer is 15cm? Or is the data insufficient?
P.S. Typo - All areas are cm2, not cm3.
|
@ 2015-11-06 5:55 AM (#19821 - in reply to #19820) (#19821) Top