|
|
deu
Posts: 69
Country : Japan | deu posted @ 2017-10-07 9:25 PM Question about Time Bonus:
When will a team be regarded as "finished"?
Submission time is recorded for each individual and the slowest time will be used for calculating time bonus. Is this correct? |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
  
Country : India | deu - 2017-10-07 9:25 PM
Question about Time Bonus:
When will a team be regarded as "finished"?
Submission time is recorded for each individual and the slowest time will be used for calculating time bonus. Is this correct?
This will be announced with the points. |
|
bskbri
Posts: 34
Country : Turkey | bskbri posted @ 2017-10-08 4:30 PM Is the table with sets same as in the competition? |
|
forcolin
Posts: 172
Country : ITALY | it is mandatory to solve the puzzles Ti before going to the individual table? Can a team forego the puzzles T and go directly to the individual tables?
Also, can a member of the team, once solved one of the puzzles Ti, leave the rest of the team to solve the remaining and go to the individual table or should all wait until all puzzles are finished? Will there be proctors to check the correctnes of the Ti solutions?
I believe the mechanism of the round is not described appropriately. |
|
David McNeill
Posts: 63
Country : United Kingdom | In the Anglers example, there is an unused cell. Could this also be the case in the competition puzzle? |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | forcolin - 2017-10-08 7:45 PM
it is mandatory to solve the puzzles Ti before going to the individual table? Can a team forego the puzzles T and go directly to the individual tables?
Also, can a member of the team, once solved one of the puzzles Ti, leave the rest of the team to solve the remaining and go to the individual table or should all wait until all puzzles are finished? Will there be proctors to check the correctnes of the Ti solutions?
I believe the mechanism of the round is not described appropriately.
This will all be made clearer in the second version. |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | David McNeill - 2017-10-09 4:15 AM
In the Anglers example, there is an unused cell. Could this also be the case in the competition puzzle?
Yup, rules do not prohibit it. |
|
kiwijam
Posts: 187
Country : New Zealand | kiwijam posted @ 2017-10-10 8:16 AM Shashigane in v2. |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | kiwijam - 2017-10-10 8:16 AM
Shashigane in v2.
Right missed this one. We suspected we'd need a final v3 with minor edits. Will wait for a day to note anything more and then publish the final version tomorrow. |
|
bskbri
Posts: 34
Country : Turkey | bskbri posted @ 2017-10-10 11:25 AM There is a given table of puzzles in the IB for 4 different sets. Is the puzzle distribution on this table same as in the competition? If not, could you write the puzzle names in the table, instead of writing Puzzle X? Otherwise we will try to search which number is which puzzle, I think this is not an aim of this round.
Note: All words table in this message refer to excel tables, not tables with 4 legs :) |
|
forcolin
Posts: 172
Country : ITALY | a sentence in the third paragraph (2nd row of 3) is meaningless and should be cancelled. if you plan for a v3....
|
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | bskbri - 2017-10-10 11:25 AM
There is a given table of puzzles in the IB for 4 different sets. Is the puzzle distribution on this table same as in the competition? If not, could you write the puzzle names in the table, instead of writing Puzzle X? Otherwise we will try to search which number is which puzzle, I think this is not an aim of this round.
Note: All words table in this message refer to excel tables, not tables with 4 legs :)
The IB table is just an illustration. The one in the round will contain the puzzle names too and will not necessarily have the same order or distribution. The randomized names are used in the IB specifically so that readers have a pause and it isn't assumed that a same distribution will be used. |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | forcolin - 2017-10-10 2:22 PM
a sentence in the third paragraph (2nd row of 3) is meaningless and should be cancelled. if you plan for a v3....
Thanks for letting us know. I'll remove this. |
@ 2017-10-07 9:25 PM (#23559 - in reply to #23484) (#23559) Top