|
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
  
Country : India | David McNeill - 2017-10-09 4:15 AM
In the Anglers example, there is an unused cell. Could this also be the case in the competition puzzle?
Yup, rules do not prohibit it. |
|
kiwijam
Posts: 187
Country : New Zealand | kiwijam posted @ 2017-10-10 8:16 AM Shashigane in v2. |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | kiwijam - 2017-10-10 8:16 AM
Shashigane in v2.
Right missed this one. We suspected we'd need a final v3 with minor edits. Will wait for a day to note anything more and then publish the final version tomorrow. |
|
bskbri
Posts: 34
Country : Turkey | bskbri posted @ 2017-10-10 11:25 AM There is a given table of puzzles in the IB for 4 different sets. Is the puzzle distribution on this table same as in the competition? If not, could you write the puzzle names in the table, instead of writing Puzzle X? Otherwise we will try to search which number is which puzzle, I think this is not an aim of this round.
Note: All words table in this message refer to excel tables, not tables with 4 legs :) |
|
forcolin
Posts: 172
Country : ITALY | a sentence in the third paragraph (2nd row of 3) is meaningless and should be cancelled. if you plan for a v3....
|
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | bskbri - 2017-10-10 11:25 AM
There is a given table of puzzles in the IB for 4 different sets. Is the puzzle distribution on this table same as in the competition? If not, could you write the puzzle names in the table, instead of writing Puzzle X? Otherwise we will try to search which number is which puzzle, I think this is not an aim of this round.
Note: All words table in this message refer to excel tables, not tables with 4 legs :)
The IB table is just an illustration. The one in the round will contain the puzzle names too and will not necessarily have the same order or distribution. The randomized names are used in the IB specifically so that readers have a pause and it isn't assumed that a same distribution will be used. |
|
prasanna16391
Posts: 1801
Country : India | forcolin - 2017-10-10 2:22 PM
a sentence in the third paragraph (2nd row of 3) is meaningless and should be cancelled. if you plan for a v3....
Thanks for letting us know. I'll remove this. |
@ 2017-10-10 1:00 AM (#23622 - in reply to #23597) (#23622) Top