I have a suggestion regarding the "pink table" on profile pages. Can it be moved to a new page, that also lists the values of N, L, U, K, Kp, and which tests are considered and how much weight for each (like Player C in the sample)? It helps cleaning the somewhat cluttered profile page, and it can display more information. In fact, if my assumption of how the table is displayed behind the stage is correct, the new page can simply have a copy of the current table, and the current profile page can have the last four columns removed. The main task would be to display a new "weight counted for the rating" column, plus computing N/L/U/K/Kp values.

^ Yeah, mostly because of laziness computing by myself.

Sounds like a good suggestion; so will get it done. It might take a while, because not all information is handy in the database.

In the meantime, ratings updated after ST4 and deu continues his top rank.

Ratings updated after JPL2

Ratings updated after Kakuro

I now have the exact same rankings as I did in the WSC and the WPC.

Ratings updated after Special 8

Ratings updated after Marathon

deu now has Rank 1 in both puzzles and sudokus.

hello everyone....this is great place to use ur talent...thanx LMI

Ratings updated after Parallel Universe

Ratings updated after Parallel Universe - II

Wanted to know how are the rating points calculated?

Check here and here.

Are the Sudoku ratings going to be updated after Road to London?

On the Road to London topic, there's a notification from the Admin that it'll take a few days.

Done

Updated ratings after 7X7

New puzzle ratings are up after the Pento Parade test.

Wow, I see William Blatt jumped up 10 places from 24th to 14th. And he didn't even compete!
(Arguably) if he had competed he might have got a lower rating, because this test had a top score well ahead of the main pack, which means everyone gets a lower score than they otherwise would.
As discussed for other competitions, basing the score for the top half of the field on the overall best score gives a wide variety of results, meaning different tests get different distributions of final scores.

Thanks for bringing this point up, James.


Yes. That's correct. Ratings can increase if (a) you do very well in the most recent test, OR (b) you had a bad performance twelve months ago (which goes out of rating calculations now) but have since done ok. Generally, we tend to correlate rating improvement with the first of these reasons, which is natural but not a complete view. LMI Rating system (Puzzles) takes into account performances over the last 12 rated puzzle tests, which roughly means twelve months. William had a (relatively) lower rating so far because of his (arguably) inferior show in the Forsmarts Anniversary contest 2013, where he was ranked 37th out of 108 non-zero scorers. In the latest ratings, he got rid of this baggage. And due to relatively stable performances over the last twelve months, his rating has improved and come close to his actual recent performances. I would say, "the rating system waited for a fair number of improved performances before registering an improvement." And, since he has not been a regular participant (yet), the rating has potential to improve further. I can see some analogy to FIDE ratings (chess), where it takes time to reach your actual rating levels.


Your argument is valid since willwc has played less tests in the recent twelve month period. For a more regular player, this argument is not valid. For example, if he had performed as well as you did on Pento Parade, he would have still reached a rating of ~833 to be 17th, a jump of 7. And, if he had got more than ~1140 on Pento Parade, he would have bettered a rating of 845 also. But, in general, yes, NS on this test would be lower because of the exceptional top score.


Agree with your point. This point has been discussed while devising the ratings formula. Also look at this post from motris summarizing the discussions around this. I am not saying we cannot make changes. But "Is an improvement needed for handling such tests with outlier performances?" is the question.

Also, you can refer to this earlier post. In the example, player D resembles willwc. So we take a straightforward weighted average of his NS to get to his rating.

You can make a similar argument for Neil as he only has 4 tests. But because two of his tests are marathons, where the PS is much higher for the top puzzlers compared to other tests, his rating average is much better.

Updated ratings after Irregular Variations.

Hi! Why do you list only the first 300? How can I find myself in the rating lists?

http://logicmastersindia.com/forum/lmi/ratings/?testType=S&full=yes...

Ratings updated after Sudoku Surprise (sorry about the delay)

After some impressive performances in last 5 sudoku tests, Kota moves to the top position.

Hello,
There has been a lot of sudoku tests these times, but few puzzle tests ( only Pentoparade in october and Forsmarts in december ).
Can we know when the next puzzle tests are planned ?

Sudoku Ratings are updated after Converse,

AND

Puzzle Ratings are updated after Puzzle Marathon.