@ 2016-01-09 7:10 AM (#20575 - in reply to #20563) (#20575) Top | |
Posts: 359 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Country : India | amitsowani posted @ 2016-01-09 7:10 AM I am a bit concerned about the amount of overlap between the WSC and WPC. But if we can design something substantially different then this can potentially used in 2 places (a WSC team round and the WPC team escape round) |
@ 2016-01-09 11:14 AM (#20577 - in reply to #20575) (#20577) Top | |
Posts: 739 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Country : India | vopani posted @ 2016-01-09 11:14 AM I think this should only be in WPC. Also, I agree with Prasanna on chucking the Skyscrapers rule. I tried creating a solution, it is quite hard, and I got a nearly perfect solution (all rules satisfied except two rows having 3-5 pieces as black-white instead of 4-4). It is a really nice team round, especially when solving with the actual pieces. DO The other rules are strong enough to create a challenging puzzle. |
@ 2016-01-09 11:16 PM (#20586 - in reply to #20577) (#20586) Top | |
Posts: 359 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Country : India | amitsowani posted @ 2016-01-09 11:16 PM If it is so constrained in terms of rules then we might have to make it instructionless (i.e provide graphical instructions during the round) Do you think this should be a separate round or it should be included in the Escape Round? (The escape round is planned to be completely instructionless/ surprise) |