classics : wow looking forward to it :)

Puzzle Points Fillomino 43 Snake 27 Kakuro 110 Akari 7 LITS 29 Battleships 62 Masyu 20 Slitherlink 23 Rectangles ? 49 Tapa ? 30 Star battle 55 Different neighbours 95 Tents 48 Untouch Yajilin 74 Hamle 78

Announcements Test length is changed to 75 minutes Updated version of IB uploaded with fixed examples of Tapa & fixed solution of Rectangles Points table added to IB. Total points is 750, bonus points changed to 10 points per minute saved Password protected puzzle booklet has 8 pages (no cover page).

Cute test. I wish I was better at kakuro.

When there is a large theme throughout a test, I often wonder if some of the puzzles will be adversely affected. Here I decided: don't worry, just be happy that there were many fun ones to do.

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Perfectly balanced
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Just right
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Fairly Nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Perfect answer keys
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	Just right
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	I have a different complaint

Maybe it's just my laser printer, but the given lines are dark enough that I have trouble drawing lines on top of the given lines in the slitherlink and fillomino.

P.S. I got destroyed, especially considering my performance of the classics in the WPC.

Edited by achan1058 2013-10-26 8:38 AM

Lovely test! I had trouble with the Kakuro, nearly 30 minutes, just tried to put digits in the top of the grid, but there was always mistakes, then I figured it out, I had put a wrong digit in the middle of the grid :) Anyway, thanks for the test Matej

Hah. I had exactly the same experience with the Kakuro. If your mistake was on the middle left then we must be solving twins.

:) ehehe yes, it was. So my puzzle brother, how is your finger?

Exactly the same as how you saw it during the closing ceremony. Its a good thing its not my right finger, or I'd be unemployed for a month and some future LMI plans would be canceled too. Says something about the risks we puzzlers take.

Same thing happened here too, though I solved it after the test was over.

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Perfectly balanced
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Just right
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Very nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Mostly perfect answer keys
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	Just right
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Most puzzles were worth the right amount
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Fairly balanced
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Just right
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Fairly Nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Mostly perfect answer keys
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	A bit too few puzzles
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Most puzzles were worth the right amount
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Perfectly balanced
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Just right
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Fairly Nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Perfect answer keys
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	Just right
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Most puzzles were worth the right amount
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Very skewed
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Too many hard puzzles
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Very nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Mostly perfect answer keys
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	Way too many puzzles (too little time)
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Most puzzles were worth the right amount
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

An enticing Puzzle test covering all the basic puzzle types ,just good enough to lure persons who are relatively new and who grapple with new puzzle types to take the test.

But alas to what use is that???The test has been timed so poorly that i felt only a mad adrenaline rush during the course of the test rather than actually enjoying the test.The experience would have been even worse had the test been timed for 60 mins.Thankfully ,a better sense prevailed and because of that extra 15 mins i was able to complete the Kakuro and submit it within time.It would have been an utter waste of effort from my part if the test were for 60mins.

This test clearly demonstrates to me that its intended purpose is only to test a minority of lightning quick solvers at the cost of taking the fun out of a majority of slow solvers (including me).After all what harm would have come out if the test had been timed for 120 mins, other than perhaps more solvers completing the test and a majority of the slower puzzlers attempting a lot more puzzles.But isn't that the actual purpose of any LMI test ?

I feel so disappointed now because the excitement that i got after seeing so many familiar puzzle types in the IB has just been killed.Now i dont even feel like seeing the rest of the 13 uncompleted puzzles let alone attempt it.The time factor has skewed my feedback in other categories as well.It has forced me to say i was hoping for better (which is certainly true in my case)regarding the overall opinion of the test.In the end it seems i have to console myself by saying Don't worry ,Be happy in which the latter seems highly unlikely to happen.


Edited by kishy72 2013-10-26 8:01 PM

I can certainly see your point. It would be nice to once in a while to have a test that even someone like me can finish, even if that means the likes of Palmer and Ulrich will finish in 1/2 the allotted time.

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	A bit skewed
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Too many hard puzzles
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Fairly Nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Perfect answer keys
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	Way too many puzzles (too little time)
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Most puzzles were worth the right amount
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

Well, We DO have Beginners' Contests for that. Admittedly, we've had just one Beginners' Puzzle Contest so far which was probably on the tough side, but we are working on a format there and it will be here in the future. Give us time :) Monthly tests are designed to have a world championship-related structure in terms of difficulty and finish-ability. The typical guideline for the monthly tests, barring special ones like sprint tests, etc. is that about 3-4 people should finish the test. Its fine to have an opinion that maybe that structure should be more lenient sometimes, but the problem comes when its pinpointed to this test just because of individual expectations that "classic puzzles = easy puzzles".

My main problem with Kishore's criticism is that it wasn't said that this test would contain easier puzzles, or that it would be more finish-able than others. This test was only said to be filled with classic puzzles, which it was. So its not like the author claimed something wrong. Its really unfair to criticize saying you expected there to be easier/finishable puzzles, especially when you yourself say that the Kakuro (highest pointer) is one you attempted.

There were quite many low and medium pointer puzzles in the test. I guess solving these puzzles will give more confidence to everyone. Since kakuro was the highest pointer we can easily assume that it ll take more time. So it must be the participant's choice of solving order. Personally i feel the puzzles were too good and kudos to Matej. Definitely i ll try solving the puzzles offline as classics will be a good platform to start from the scratch. Thanks to Matej again for the Classics set.

Edited by rvarun 2013-10-26 10:16 PM

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Fairly balanced
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Fairly Nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Answer keys could have been better
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	A bit too many puzzles
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Fairly balanced
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Just right
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Average
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Answer keys could have been better
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	Just right
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Most puzzles were worth too much or too little
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Fairly balanced
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Just right
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Fairly Nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Mostly perfect answer keys
How did you feel about the length / time limit for this test?	Just right
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

How balanced do you think the puzzle types of this test were?	Fairly balanced
What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles?	Just right
What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test?	Fairly Nice
What was your opinion about the answer key extraction?	Perfect answer keys
Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty?	Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing?	Just right

Wow, that's crazy! I also spent lots of time on Kakuro due to a wrong digit at the left of the grid...Anyway: fun puzzles!Denis

I think kishy72 has a point. Setting the duration of a test such that only the top solvers can finish is a poor decision when instant grading is available. Why is not the test longer so that more people can enjoy all puzzles?

With the current test length the selection of puzzles is very important for an average solver. I think it should not be that important unless you want to increase the influence of the luck factor in the rankings.

I still don't understand this, because its like every test. For anyone who can't finish a test, puzzle selection matters. Thats not luck. It would be luck if points distribution was not given and someone went and attempted the Kakuro thinking it to be easy or the Akari thinking they'd get more points for it. But its known which are the lower pointers and the higher pointers, its upto the solver to select the puzzles in a way to optimize their performance. Thats a part of competing. Every Monthly test barring exceptions is typically designed so that the top 3-4 players can finish and there's a few easy puzzles for the rest. In fact, this test has more easy puzzles than others, in my opinion. Its not like 75 minutes is an unheard of time, in fact the ever successful TVCs are also of 75 minutes.

The guidelines LMI gives to the authors was followed here. There were a few easy puzzles, and it was finishable for top solvers. There was never claims that it would be otherwise. Why pinpoint this test on being timed poorly, when it followed the general guidelines?

Obviously, if the discussion is that the general guidelines themselves should be re-visited, then thats a completely different matter. I'll again point to the existence of Beginners' Contests and the need to make the distinction that the Monthly tests are set based on general WPC difficulty and finish-ability.

This is how LMI tests work. Top few solvers solving all puzzles in given time, be it 120 mins or 75 mins. This test is same as any other LMI test. I dont find any difference in it in my experience of LMI tests. The same goes for sudoku tests also. There were sudoku tests with 60 or 75 mins. But the same feedbacks does not come there.