PR 2023 R4 - Number Placement & Object Placement (17^{th} - 23^{rd} Mar) Score •Discuss

SM 2023 R4 - Neighbours & Converse (24^{th} - 30^{th} Mar) has started •Discuss

SM 2023 R4 - Neighbours & Converse (24

@ 2012-03-14 6:29 AM (#6903 - in reply to #6898) (#6903) Top | |

Posts: 337 Country : Switzerland |
Para - 2012-03-14 12:15 AM My main problem in this test is that the hard parts of the grids were all in the opening steps, even for the easier grids. So if you don't see the opening steps, you can't make any progress at all. There's a difference between a hard step when you have 25 digits in the grid or 45 digits in the grid. I had all these empty grids constantly where I was just looking for an opening which I couldn't find. It feels a bit frustrating to not be able to put any digits in. How much earlier the trickiest step is, the bigger the variation in solving times will be. I started with the Argyle and couldn't solve it logically, which is why it took me almost 20 minutes to even submit a single grid after I decided to give up on it for now and go solve the diagonal instead. They were nice puzzles, I just got stuck without making even a decent start too much, which was frustrating. My favourites were the Queen and Pointing Evens as I actually solved those 2 in a good flow, many of the others it took me too much effort to start. Bram, you're right about the opening of several grids. I think that I like these hard openings. When a grid is already half-solved and need a hard step to be finished, I think it's easier to bifurcate and to finish the grid without taking the hard (but perhaps interesting) logical step. When it's in the beginning of the grid, I think it has better chance to showcase solver's skills. But of course, it creates lot of discomfort if you don't see it ! Abour argyle: I'm sure a player like you is able to solve this grid logically. It really solves without real hard steps. Perhaps you missed a naked single or a pair in a marked diagonal, I think these are the hardest steps needed to solve this one. The opening of this one is not hard, one can complete almost fully boxes 4-5-6 without any effort. After that there are a few things to see, that's right... I'll perhaps post some explanations in the coming few days about some grids, especially the openings (diagonal, creasing, twins, little killer...). Fred |

@ 2012-03-15 4:04 AM (#6921 - in reply to #6903) (#6921) Top | |

Posts: 315 Country : The Netherlands |
Fred76 - 2012-03-14 6:29 AM Bram, you're right about the opening of several grids. I think that I like these hard openings. When a grid is already half-solved and need a hard step to be finished, I think it's easier to bifurcate and to finish the grid without taking the hard (but perhaps interesting) logical step. When it's in the beginning of the grid, I think it has better chance to showcase solver's skills. But of course, it creates lot of discomfort if you don't see it ! Abour argyle: I'm sure a player like you is able to solve this grid logically. It really solves without real hard steps. Perhaps you missed a naked single or a pair in a marked diagonal, I think these are the hardest steps needed to solve this one. The opening of this one is not hard, one can complete almost fully boxes 4-5-6 without any effort. After that there are a few things to see, that's right... I'll perhaps post some explanations in the coming few days about some grids, especially the openings (diagonal, creasing, twins, little killer...). Fred I hardly ever bifurcate, especially in sudoku. Bifurcation just leads to errors for me. Showcased in philadelphia when the last round you were basically told to bifurcate and 2 of my 4 solutions had errors. I understand the early harder steps will more avoid bifurcation, but which isn't bad for the higher point puzzles but maybe isn't necessary for all puzzles. It comes over a bit weird to me when my fastest solve is the 85 point puzzle. For the argyle I missed a hidden single in row 7, after I checked to see what I missed. I was just thinking it would have been nicer for there to be something easier. The easiest puzzle being 4-5 minutes for the faster solvers seems very long for me. But maybe I'm just more used to puzzle competitions which generally have more puzzles than Sudoku competitions and the easier puzzles take less time. It's just a personal thing. |

@ 2012-03-16 8:37 PM (#6937 - in reply to #6921) (#6937) Top | |

Posts: 337 Country : Switzerland |
Some little explanations on some grids: 1. Diagonal sudoku Preliminary remark: The 1rst glance suggests that the opening has something to do with the first diagonal (R1C1 to R9C9), with lot of clues in boxes 1, 5 and 9. There are a couple of easy placements: 7 in R4C6 and 3 in R6C7. One can view the clues 134 in boxes 5 and 9, which leads to have a triplet 134 on the diagonal in box 1. Then you can place the 7 and 9 in box 1. Then you can place some other 7's, and then some 9's, which leads to a pair 89 in the central box. After this point you can solve box 9, and then, etc... finish to solve the grid (diago.png) Attachments ---------------- diago.png (33KB - 0 downloads) |

@ 2012-03-16 8:50 PM (#6938 - in reply to #6937) (#6938) Top | |

Posts: 337 Country : Switzerland |
2. Creasing sudoku Preliminary remark: This sudoku has a hard opening, because you have to think "globally" about the configuration of marked diagonals, especially 5-cells diagonals ! There are a couple of easy placements: 8 in R2C7 (can't be in C8 because no greater digit can be in this marked diagonal) and 6 in R8C8. Let's analyse a bit the 5-cells diagonals. If you follow the path of these marked diagonal, it has to alternate between increasing and decreasing diagonal (If you had 2 increasing diagonals following each other, you should have digits 1-9, and then it would be impossible to have 2 decreasing diagonals from 9 to 1). So digits in R1C5 and R9C5 have to be a) both greater than 5 or b) smaller than 5. Ditto for cells R5C1 and R5C9. We can see that only one digit greater than 5, the 7 can be placed in R1C5 and R9C5. So these cells must contain digits smaller than 5. Thus Cells R5C1 and R5C9 must contain digits greater than 5. We have found the direction of increasing and decreasing diagonals ! Knowing that, you can place the 8 in R5C1, then in R4C8, then the 9 in R5C9 (must be greater than the 8), etc... Edited by Fred76 2012-03-16 8:51 PM (creasinga.png) (creasingb.png) Attachments ---------------- creasinga.png (24KB - 0 downloads) creasingb.png (25KB - 0 downloads) |

@ 2012-03-16 9:00 PM (#6939 - in reply to #6938) (#6939) Top | |

Posts: 337 Country : Switzerland |
Let's speak a bit about little killer: Preliminary remark: The grid is constructed on the 6-cells diagonals ! Of course you can place digits on the 4 corners of the grid (I try to delete these clues, but I think it was hard enough with them ). One can see the 6-cells diagonal with clue 48. That's the maximum possible. Cells have to contain 2 triplet 789. With these triplets, both 6-cells diagonal with clue 16 are then the minimum possible. So you can place pairs 12 and 7 in one box and a triplet 123 in the other box. And finally, with these triplets placed, you can see that the last 6-cells diagonal, with clue 20 is now the minimum possible, with the sum of two 145 triplet which can be placed. One fun placement now is the 2 in the middle of the grid (fun because it's rare to be able to place a digit in the center of a little killer in the beginning of the resolution). (littlekillera.png) (littlekillerb.png) (littlekillerc.png) Attachments ---------------- littlekillera.png (31KB - 0 downloads) littlekillerb.png (34KB - 0 downloads) littlekillerc.png (35KB - 0 downloads) |

@ 2012-03-16 9:11 PM (#6940 - in reply to #6939) (#6940) Top | |

Posts: 337 Country : Switzerland |
Finally (then I stop and let you concentrate on the tapa contest ), I want to speak about the diagonal twin sudoku. There is (at least) 2 openings for these grids. You can begin with the corners. With grid A you can place 8 in R1C9, 4 in R9C9, and Grid B let you know the two other corners. But there is another opening, which I find more elegant: You can start with the center of the grids: box 5. Grid A let you know that digits in white cells are 3,5,7 and 8. Knowing that individually they can't be placed in the same cell let you place the 5 in R5C6, the 3 in R5C4, then the 8 in R6C5 and 7 in R4C5 in grid B. Then in both grids, 6 can be placed in R5C5, you have a pair 14 in cells R6C46, then 2 in R4C4 and 9 in R4C6. Of course, you'll need still lot of work to solve these grids, but box 5 is almost filled (diagotwin2.png) Attachments ---------------- diagotwin2.png (18KB - 0 downloads) |