![]() | |
Posts: 739 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Country : India | vopani posted @ 2011-07-05 6:49 PM I doubt if diagonals would work in large grids so I go for Method 1. |
![]() | |
Posts: 774 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Country : India | rakesh_rai posted @ 2011-07-05 7:37 PM Another answer key could perhaps be the number of tents in both diagonals. In this case, it would be (1,0) Edited by rakesh_rai 2011-07-05 7:39 PM |
![]() | |
![]() Posts: 1868 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Country : India | debmohanty posted @ 2011-07-05 8:01 PM rakesh_rai - 2011-07-05 7:37 PM Another answer key could perhaps be the number of tents in both diagonals. In this case, it would be (1,0) Rohan mentioned that 'describing diagonals won't work. I'm not sure what he meant, but I think he was trying to say that the diagonals will/may be solved early. In that case #of tents in both diagonals won't work too. |