@ 2010-12-07 5:23 PM (#2833 - in reply to #2832) (#2833) Top
Country : India
debmohanty posted @ 2010-12-07 5:23 PM
Thanks for explaining, and I now understand what you are saying.
But it would simply increase the solving time unnecessarily, and adds an error-prone element to the puzzle.
To answer Rakesh's question "Do you really want to prevent that? " - I don't think we really need to do anything to prevent it. Definitely not by adding more complexities for genuine solvers.
But it would simply increase the solving time unnecessarily, and adds an error-prone element to the puzzle.
To answer Rakesh's question "Do you really want to prevent that? " - I don't think we really need to do anything to prevent it. Definitely not by adding more complexities for genuine solvers.
@ 2010-12-07 9:24 PM (#2840 - in reply to #2692) (#2840) TopPosts: 10
Country : India
keshava.hs posted @ 2010-12-07 9:24 PM
Hi,
I feel, we should not do anything to prevent Guess work, True Champions will always emerge in a long run.
Guess work will not produce results always, Just to prevent Guess work, we should not complicate Puzzle Interface.
Easier/simple Interface will attract more puzzlers, I think which is also one of the main aim of LMI.
This is my personal feeling.
Thanks again for your precious time in organizing wonderful event.
Best Reagrds,
Keshav
Edited by keshava.hs 2010-12-07 9:45 PM
I feel, we should not do anything to prevent Guess work, True Champions will always emerge in a long run.
Guess work will not produce results always, Just to prevent Guess work, we should not complicate Puzzle Interface.
Easier/simple Interface will attract more puzzlers, I think which is also one of the main aim of LMI.
This is my personal feeling.
Thanks again for your precious time in organizing wonderful event.
Best Reagrds,
Keshav
Edited by keshava.hs 2010-12-07 9:45 PM